Says explained
The film draws a diagram of the plan, and then follows it. If you accept the premise it works.
Armageddon (1998)
At 2:25:00
Verdict: Guilty. 75% of viewers say this is dumb. Top defense: The film simplifies the physics so the bomb's success is easy to understand.
870 votes
Dumbness rating
7.3/ 10(870 ratings)Is this scene dumb, or does it make sense?
Rate how dumb
The plan is that the bomb will split the asteroid in two, and the halves will pass on either side of Earth. The film shows the split as a clean cut. Real asteroid fragments would continue moving close together.
The tone toggle also switches the reviews below. Contains spoilers for this scene only.
Says explained
The film draws a diagram of the plan, and then follows it. If you accept the premise it works.
Says dumb
Fragments of a split asteroid would keep most of their speed and direction, and many would still hit Earth. The film's clean split does not reflect that.
Says dumb
It is a simple concept but not an accurate one. A line from a scientist about the risk would have made it feel less like a cheat.
The film simplifies the physics so the bomb's success is easy to understand.
The film simplifies the physics so the bomb's success is easy to understand.
Fixes are written by people. The smallest change, in 200 characters or fewer, that would have fixed the scene. AI is used only for duplicate detection, length and moderation.
Truman says the halves will still be dangerous, but small enough for defense systems to handle. The film shows that after the split.