Armageddon1998

Directed by Michael Bay · 1998 · Movie · 2h 31m

ActionAdventureScience FictionThriller

With an asteroid heading for Earth, NASA recruits a crew of deep-sea oil drillers to land on it and stop the impact.

11.2dumb per hour
Pause to Rant

Lower is better.

7 scenes flagged

3
Guilty
2
Contested
2
Explained

6,020 ratings

7
Scenes flagged
6,020
Ratings
3,710
Dumb votes
2,310
Explained votes
1
Not scored
Pete
First to flag

Is Armageddon dumb?

Armageddon scores 11.2 dumb scenes per hour, which puts it in the Pause to Rant band. Lower is better. 4 of its 7 flagged scenes count toward that score, based on 6,020 ratings.

3 scenes are Guilty (most viewers say dumb), 2 Contested and 2 Explained. Explained scenes do not count.

Where does Armageddon go wrong?

The most common problems are “Broken science” (2 scenes), “Convenient coincidence” (2 scenes) and “Plot hole” (2 scenes).

Is it worth watching if I hate “Broken science”?

2 of 7 flagged scenes are tagged “Broken science”. It shows up regularly. The highest rated one is Why would one bomb split the asteroid evenly so both halves miss Earth?.

Is it worth watching if I hate “Convenient coincidence”?

2 of 7 flagged scenes are tagged “Convenient coincidence”. It shows up regularly. The highest rated one is Why did NASA only discover the asteroid with 18 days left?.

Scenes in Armageddon

Reviews

On the scene

Why did NASA train oil drillers instead of sending astronauts?
plothole_peteFounding Critic #7Supporter8/10Nov 11, 2026

Says dumb

It would be easier to teach a trained astronaut how to run a drill than to teach drillers to be astronauts. The film's reason is a punchline, not an argument.

On the scene

Why did NASA train oil drillers instead of sending astronauts?
quietcutFounding Critic #12Supporter7/10AI rewriteOct 4, 2026

Says dumb

The film's logic is that drillers are tough, so they can be astronauts. A reasonable person would send a small team of both and call it a day.

On the scene

Why does the bomb have to be set 800 feet deep inside the asteroid?
rocketry_rob8/10Oct 24, 2026

Says dumb

Splitting a body that large in two so cleanly would take far more energy than a single bomb. Moving it a long time earlier would be a better plan, and the film knows it.

On the scene

Why would one bomb split the asteroid evenly so both halves miss Earth?
rocketry_rob8/10Oct 14, 2026

Says dumb

Fragments of a split asteroid would keep most of their speed and direction, and many would still hit Earth. The film's clean split does not reflect that.

On the scene

Why did Harry take AJ's place on the asteroid?
tessa_in_the_aisle5/10Oct 16, 2026

Says explained

The film sets this up from the beginning, with Harry's feelings about AJ and his daughter. It is a classic sacrifice and the story earns it.

On the scene

Why did NASA only discover the asteroid with 18 days left?
nopeanut_ninaSupporter7/10Oct 29, 2026

Says dumb

An object that large would be tracked for years. The film does not explain why this one slipped through, and a short line about it would have helped.

On the scene

Why did the remote detonator fail?
canon_keeperFounding Critic #3Supporter5/10Oct 20, 2026

Says explained

The film shows that the mission has equipment trouble all through. A manual backup is a reasonable plan and the failure forces the final choice.

On the scene

Why do the drillers drive the Armadillo across the asteroid like a dune buggy?
eagles_were_busy7/10AI rewriteOct 22, 2026

Says explained

It is an action movie and this is an action scene. If you want a realistic space drive, this is the wrong movie.